Using technology to prevent fraud in high stakes national school examinations: Evidence from Indonesia
Journal of Development Economics · 2024 · Emilie Berkhout、Menno Pradhan、Rahmawati Rahmawati、Daniel Suryadarma、Arya Swarnata
中文摘要
作弊降低了考试的信号价值。它还使教师和学生把注意力从学习上转移开。打击普遍存在的作弊十分困难,因为学生、教师和官僚都从虚高的报告成绩中获益。我们评估了基于计算机的考试(CBT)的影响,这是印度尼西亚政府为减少全国考试中普遍存在的作弊而实施的一项大规模政策。利用该计划于2015年至2019年的分阶段推行,我们发现,在引入CBT之后,考试成绩大幅下降,降幅为0.5个标准差。在采用CBT之前其作答模式表明存在作弊的学校,成绩下降更为陡峭。在是否有计算机实验室的学校之间,这一效应相似,表明作弊机会的减少是成绩下降的主要原因。在CBT采用率高的地区,仍使用纸笔考试的学校作弊更少、成绩更低,表明CBT存在溢出效应。这些结果凸显了技术在提高教育部门克服串谋行为之成效方面的潜在作用。
Abstract
Cheating reduces the signaling value of examinations. It also shifts the focus of teachers and students away from learning. Combating widespread cheating is difficult as students, teachers, and bureaucrats all benefit from high reported grades. We evaluate the impact of computer-based testing (CBT), an at-scale policy implemented by the Indonesian government to reduce widespread cheating in the national examinations. Exploiting the phased roll-out of the program from 2015 to 2019, we find that test scores declined dramatically, by 0.5 standard deviations, after the introduction of CBT. Schools with response patterns that indicated cheating prior to CBT adoption experienced a steeper decline. The effect is similar between schools with and without access to a computer lab, indicating that the reduction in the opportunity to cheat is the main reason for the test score decline. In districts with high adoption of CBT, schools that still used paper-based exams cheated less and scored lower, indicating spillovers of CBT. The results highlight the potential role of technology in improving the effectiveness in efforts to overcome collusive behavior in the education sector.