Journal of the European Economic Association · 2022 · Jaakko Meriläinen、Matti Mitrunen、Tuomo Virkola
中文摘要
本文利用新收集的芬兰历史数据,呈现了一项饥荒在历史条件约束下所产生长期后果的证据。我们记录了直到1918年暴力起义之前,当地在收入与土地分配方面存在的高水平不平等。这些不平等部分源于1866—1868年的饥荒,该饥荒加剧了土地与权力向大地主集中。我们进一步表明,到20世纪初,饥荒暴露程度更高的地区存在更多的劳动强制。这些内部紧张关系在俄国革命以及芬兰从俄罗斯帝国独立之后引发了暴力冲突。利用涵盖1918年芬兰内战全部伤亡者的微观数据,我们证明,饥荒通过上述因素很可能促进了当地叛乱的参与。尽管未能成功取代政府,这场叛乱仍带来了重大的政策变化,包括激进的土地再分配以及选举权的全面扩展。这些全国性改革使受饥荒影响更深、冲突前不平等更严重的地区出现了更为剧烈的平等化转变。我们的发现凸显了历史冲击可能产生巨大而持久、但并非直截了当的影响。
Abstract
Abstract This paper employs newly collected historical data from Finland to present evidence of historically contingent, long-run consequences of a famine. We document high levels of local inequality in terms of income and land distribution until a violent uprising in 1918. These inequalities partly originated from the famine of 1866–1868, which increased the concentration of land and power to large landowners. We further show that regions with more exposure to the famine had more labor coercion by the early 1900s. These inner tensions led to violent conflict following the Russian Revolution and the Finnish independence from the Russian Empire. Using microdata on all the casualties of the 1918 Finnish Civil War, we demonstrate that the famine plausibly contributed to local insurgency participation through these factors. Although unsuccessful in replacing the government, the insurgency led to significant policy changes, including radical land redistribution and a full extension of the franchise. These national reforms led to a more drastic shift toward equality in locations more affected by the famine with greater pre-conflict inequality. Our findings highlight how historical shocks can have large and long-lasting, but not straightforward impacts.