Relational Roots of Civic Fields: Capital Conversion and Organizational Reproduction in a Developing Country
中文摘要
社会科学界长期通过两种主导视角研究公民组织的兴起:需求侧理论认为这些团体填补了政府与市场失灵留下的空缺;供给侧理论则强调资源动员与资源依赖。然而,对于当代非营利组织和社会企业如何在日益网络化、专业化且竞争激烈的环境中兴起,这些理论的解释并不充分。本文考察公民场域的关系性根源,聚焦于新组织借以孵化、获得资源并获得合法性的具体联系与互动。本文以一个发展中国家的十余个新公民组织为案例,展示创始人如何借助人际与组织间联系,将社会资本转换为智力资本、经济资本、人力资本与象征资本。然而,这种资本转换能力取决于行动者在场域中的位置以及内嵌于其惯习之中的性情倾向。这些过程促成了该场域的组织再生产——即对专业实践、资助模式以及与国家保持一致的取向的再生产,它们映照出创始人所共享的社会(不)位置与性情倾向。随着公民组织在发展与治理中扮演日益突出的角色,理解其关系性起源有助于解释谁的社会变革愿景得以获得组织形态。
Abstract
Social scientists have long studied the emergence of civic organizations through two dominant perspectives: demand-side theories arguing that these groups fill gaps left by government and market failures, and supply-side theories emphasizing resource mobilization and dependence. However, these theories insufficiently account for how contemporary nonprofits and social enterprises arise in increasingly networked, professionalized, and competitive environments. This article interrogates the relational roots of civic fields, centering the concrete ties and interactions through which new organizations are incubated, resourced, and legitimated. Using the case of a dozen new civic organizations in a developing country, I show how founders leverage interpersonal and interorganizational ties to convert social capital into intellectual, economic, human, and symbolic capital. However, this ability for capital conversion depended on actors’ positions in the field and dispositions embedded in their habitus. These processes contribute to the field’s organizational reproduction —that is, reproduction of professional practices, funding models, and state-aligned approaches mirroring founders’ shared social (dis)positions. As civic organizations play increasingly prominent roles in development and governance, understanding their relational origins helps explain whose visions of social change gain organizational form.