The impact of immunotherapy on reductions in cancer mortality: Evidence from Medicare
Journal of Health Economics · 2026 · Danea Horn、Abby E. Alpert、Mark Duggan、Mireille Jacobson
中文摘要
免疫疗法是癌症治疗领域的一项突破性创新,但也是最昂贵的治疗之一,每位患者的费用超过15万美元。我们研究免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的引入——这是使用最广泛的一类免疫疗法药物。2022年,ICIs占Medicare B部分175亿美元癌症药物支出的44%。我们聚焦于转移性黑色素瘤,即ICIs首个获批的适应症。尽管自20世纪90年代以来总体癌症死亡率不断下降,但黑色素瘤死亡率直到2010年代初期仍在上升。随着2011年和2014年首批ICI获批,黑色素瘤死亡率急剧下降。我们利用传统Medicare报销数据,以转移性结直肠癌(CRC)为参照——ICI直到2017年才获准用于该病——估计ICIs的引入对转移性黑色素瘤患者医疗服务利用、成本以及1年生存率的影响。获批时间的差异使我们能够将ICIs的效应与更广泛的癌症治疗趋势分离开来。我们发现,ICIs使1年死亡率降低了6.2%。由于约每5名转移性黑色素瘤患者中有1名接受了ICIs治疗,这意味着在接受治疗的患者中死亡率降低了28.0%。ICIs的引入还减少了化疗和放疗的使用,但使Medicare支出增加了59.3%;在接受ICI治疗的患者中,增幅约为260%。考虑到一年以上的预期寿命收益,ICIs给黑色素瘤患者带来的收益似乎与大幅增加的Medicare成本相当,甚至可能更高。尽管如此,鉴于其巨大的生存收益且替代治疗很少,ICI的使用率仍然相对较低,这表明成本和其他障碍限制了患者的可及性。
Abstract
Immunotherapy is a breakthrough innovation in cancer care, but it is also among the most expensive treatments, with costs exceeding $150,000 per patient. We study the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the most widely used class of immunotherapy drugs. In 2022, ICIs accounted for 44% of the $17.5 billion Medicare Part B cancer drug spending. We focus on metastatic melanoma, the first approved indication for ICIs. While overall cancer mortality rates declined since the 1990s, melanoma mortality rates increased through the early 2010s. Following the first ICI approvals in 2011 and 2014, melanoma mortality declined sharply. Using traditional Medicare claims, we estimate the impact of the introduction of ICIs on healthcare utilization, costs, and 1-year survival for patients with metastatic melanoma, relative to metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), where ICIs were not approved until 2017. Variation in approval timing allows us to isolate the effect of ICIs from broader cancer care trends. We find that ICIs reduced 1-year mortality by 6.2%. Since about 1 in 5 metastatic melanoma patients received ICIs, this implies a 28.0% reduction among treated patients. The introduction of ICIs also reduced chemotherapy and radiation use, but increased Medicare spending by 59.3% or about 260% among ICI-treated patients. Accounting for life expectancy gains beyond one year, the benefits of ICIs for melanoma patients appear comparable, or potentially even greater, than the substantial added Medicare costs. Nonetheless, ICI use remains relatively low given large survival benefits and few alternative treatments, suggesting that costs and other barriers limit patient access.