← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

谈判中的性别差异:干预措施能否缩小差距?

Gender Differences in Negotiation: Can Interventions Reduce the Gap?
Annual Review of Economics · 2023 · María P. Recalde、Lise Vesterlund

中文摘要

谈判中的性别差异被视为造成劳动力市场结果中持续性别差距的一个因素。我们回顾了旨在减弱谈判差异的干预措施相关文献,并评估其在缩小性别薪酬差距方面的有效性。我们介绍了旨在提高女性参与谈判的频率及改善其谈判方式的举措研究,以及禁止谈判、禁止询问雇员薪资历史和提高工资透明度的制度变革。在回顾这些举措有效性证据的同时,我们也指出了实施时值得警惕的非预期后果。综述清楚地表明,最初推动女性更多地以男性方式进行谈判的努力,已转向改变谈判本身的条件。这一转变不仅源于希望考虑“修正制度”而非“修正女性”的政策倾向,也源于有证据表明这些干预措施在实现薪酬公平方面更为成功。

Abstract

Gender differences in negotiation are seen as contributing to the persistent gender gaps in labor market outcomes. We review the literature on interventions aiming to mute differences in negotiation and assess their effectiveness in reducing the gender pay gap. We present research on initiatives that aspire to increase how often and how women negotiate, as well as institutional changes that ban negotiations, ban requests for employee salary history, and improve wage transparency. Along with reviewing evidence on the effectiveness of these initiatives, we point to unintended consequences that warrant caution at implementation. The review makes clear that initial efforts to push women to negotiate more like men have shifted to alter instead the conditions of the negotiation. This shift results not only from wanting to consider policies that “fix the institutions” rather than “fixing the women,” but also from evidence that these interventions are more successful in securing pay equity.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →