← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

谈判中的性别差异: 干预能缩小差距吗?

Gender Differences in Negotiation: Can Interventions Reduce the Gap?
Annual Review of Economics · 2023 · [{"name": "María P. Recalde", "affiliation": ["The University of Melbourne"]}, {"name": "Lise Vesterlund", "affiliation": ["National Bureau of Economic Research", "University of Pittsburgh"]}]

中文摘要

谈判中的性别差异被认为是导致劳动力市场结果中性别差距持续存在的因素之一。我们回顾了旨在缩小谈判差异的干预措施的相关文献,并评估了其在缩小性别薪酬差距方面的有效性。我们介绍了旨在提高女性谈判频率、改善女性谈判方式的相关举措研究,以及禁止谈判、禁止询问员工薪资历史、提高工资透明度等制度变革。在回顾这些举措有效性证据的同时,我们也指出了实施时需谨慎对待的意外后果。本文综述清楚表明,最初推动女性像男性一样更多谈判的努力,已转向改变谈判条件本身。这一转向不仅源于希望考虑“修复制度”而非“修复女性”的政策,也源于有证据表明,这些干预措施在实现薪酬公平方面更为成功。

Abstract

Gender differences in negotiation are seen as contributing to the persistent gender gaps in labor market outcomes. We review the literature on interventions aiming to mute differences in negotiation and assess their effectiveness in reducing the gender pay gap. We present research on initiatives that aspire to increase how often and how women negotiate, as well as institutional changes that ban negotiations, ban requests for employee salary history, and improve wage transparency. Along with reviewing evidence on the effectiveness of these initiatives, we point to unintended consequences that warrant caution at implementation. The review makes clear that initial efforts to push women to negotiate more like men have shifted to alter instead the conditions of the negotiation. This shift results not only from wanting to consider policies that “fix the institutions” rather than “fixing the women,” but also from evidence that these interventions are more successful in securing pay equity.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →