理论论文

理论论文

清除筛选

2 篇 · 第 1 / 1 页

Self-Fulfilling Debt Crises with Long Stagnations

长期停滞下的自我实现型债务危机

Journal of Political Economy · 2025, 133(12) · João Ayres、Gastón Navarro、Juan Pablo Nicolini、Pedro Teles ·

财政收入政府债务

我们定量评估了预期驱动的主权债务危机的重要性,重点关注2010年代初的南欧危机和2001年阿根廷违约。多重均衡的来源是Calvo所提出的一种机制。对多重均衡而言至关重要的是一个以长期高增长或长期停滞为特征的产出过程,我们利用这些国家的数据对该过程进行了估计。我们的分析表明,预期驱动的债务危机在数量上具有重要性,但具有状态依赖性,因为它们只在停滞时期发生。预期及其对政策的反应,是解释西班牙与阿根廷之间违约率和信用利差差异的主要因素。

英文原文

We assess the quantitative relevance of expectations-driven sovereign debt crises, focusing on the southern European crisis of the early 2010s and the Argentine default of 2001. The source of multiplicity is the one proposed by Calvo. Crucial for multiplicity is an output process characterized by long periods of either high growth or stagnation, which we estimate using data for these countries. Our analysis suggests that expectations-driven debt crises are quantitatively relevant but state dependent, as they occur only during periods of stagnation. Expectations and how they respond to policy are the major factors explaining default rates and credit spread differences between Spain and Argentina.

Rationed Fertility: Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in the Child Quantity-Quality Trade-Off

配给生育:子女数量-质量权衡中的处理效应异质性

Journal of Political Economy · 2025, 133(10) · Rufei Guo、Junjian Yi、Junsen Zhang、Ning Zhang ·

劳动经济学应用计量方法人口应用计量方法

我们构建了生育配给的一个广义理论,以分析子女数量-质量权衡中的处理效应异质性。生育的外生增加既可能是合意的,也可能是非合意的。我们推导出,合意的生育增加对子女质量具有正的配给收入效应,而非合意的生育增加则具有负的配给收入效应。我们提出了一个识别合意与非合意生育增加之处理效应的计量经济学框架,并估计了一个结构模型,以衡量这一新颖的配给收入效应在数量上的重要性。我们的研究凸显了在评估社会项目时区分合意变化与非合意变化的重要性。

英文原文

We develop a generalized theory of rationed fertility to analyze treatment effect heterogeneity in the child quantity-quality trade-off. An exogenous increase in fertility can be either desired or undesired. We derive a positive rationing income effect on child quality for desired fertility increases but a negative rationing income effect for undesired fertility increases. We propose an econometric framework to identify treatment effects of desired and undesired fertility increases and estimate a structural model to gauge the quantitative importance of the novel rationing income effect. Our study highlights the importance of distinguishing between desired and undesired changes when evaluating social programs.